<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reduction, Identity, and Explanation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/reduction-identity-and-explanation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/reduction-identity-and-explanation/</link>
	<description>The usual phlegm and philosophy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philosophical Trends &#171; Philosophy Sucks!</title>
		<link>http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/reduction-identity-and-explanation/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosophical Trends &#171; Philosophy Sucks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/?p=243#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>[...] (here, here and here). Of course RC disagreed that the reverse-zombie argument worked, but he was wrong about that. So, the issue here, as I have said all along, was whether or not the zombie argument [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (here, here and here). Of course RC disagreed that the reverse-zombie argument worked, but he was wrong about that. So, the issue here, as I have said all along, was whether or not the zombie argument [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question Begging Thought Experiments &#171; Philosophy Sucks!</title>
		<link>http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/reduction-identity-and-explanation/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Question Begging Thought Experiments &#171; Philosophy Sucks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/?p=243#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>[...] are identical nonetheless). This is why the debate between the materialist and the dualist is not a debate about reduction and why RC&#8217;s way of framing the zombie argument is bad. The better way to do it is in terms [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are identical nonetheless). This is why the debate between the materialist and the dualist is not a debate about reduction and why RC&#8217;s way of framing the zombie argument is bad. The better way to do it is in terms [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reverse-Zombies, Dualism, and Reduction &#171; Philosophy Sucks!</title>
		<link>http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/reduction-identity-and-explanation/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverse-Zombies, Dualism, and Reduction &#171; Philosophy Sucks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/?p=243#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>[...] and argued that the issue of reduction is itself a question begging way of putting the dispute (Reduction, Identity, and Explanation). RC ignores the argument that I gave and instead says that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and argued that the issue of reduction is itself a question begging way of putting the dispute (Reduction, Identity, and Explanation). RC ignores the argument that I gave and instead says that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Chappell</title>
		<link>http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/reduction-identity-and-explanation/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Chappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 19:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemorebrown.wordpress.com/?p=243#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>Follow-up: &lt;a href="http://www.philosophyetc.net/2008/05/ontological-reduction.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ontological Reduction&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow-up: <a href="http://www.philosophyetc.net/2008/05/ontological-reduction.html" rel="nofollow">Ontological Reduction</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
